Client
Duration
3 Financial Years
(FY23–26)
Channels
Google, Meta & LinkedIn Ads
Geography
Pan India 🇮🇳
1,903 Leads
60% qualification rate
1,688 Leads
48% qualification rate
6,514 Leads
59% qualification rate
A brand relying on the wrong channels
When we started, the lead pipeline was thin, conversion tracking was broken, and Meta was barely being used.
In FY24, incoming leads were 1,903 — already low for a national B2B brand. By FY25, this had dropped a further 11% to 1,688, with qualification rate falling sharply from 60% to 48%.
Google Ads was reporting 239,000 "conversions" — but these were micro-events: page views, video views, scroll depth. Actual lead counts from Google were just 212. The account was optimising for the wrong objective entirely.
Meta/Instagram Ads had a total budget of ₹9,413 across FY25 — less than a day's budget for a serious campaign. Only 8 leads were tracked. The channel's B2B lead potential was completely unexplored.
Junk leads were consuming sales team bandwidth. With a 52% junk rate in FY25, more than half of every rupee spent on ads was generating noise, not pipeline.
The approach wasn't about spending more — it was about spending smarter and rebuilding from the ground up.
Stripped out all micro-event conversions and reconfigured campaigns to optimise only for qualified lead form submissions. This alone revealed the true picture — Google Ads was generating real leads, just uncounted.
Moved Meta from a brand awareness play to a full lead generation channel — deploying Instant Forms, audience segmentation by institution type (schools, colleges, labs), and creative testing at scale.
Top-performing ads answered real buyer questions: "How much will a new science lab cost?" and "Build Science Labs with Labkafe." These led to ₹21–28 CPL — the strongest ROI in the entire account.
Google spend was cut 40% and redistributed to Meta where CPL was demonstrably lower. The result: 20× more Meta spend, 10× more reach, and a category-leading cost per qualified lead.
Audience exclusions, negative keyword hygiene, and form qualification questions were introduced to reduce junk leads — bringing the rate back from 52% to 41% despite 3.9× more volume.
Spend cut by 40%, fixed conversion tracking, cost-per-conversion improved sharply
₹0.72 CPL
Unfixed conversion tracking, brand awareness focus
Key Metric
239,000 reported "conversions" (mostly micro-events)
₹0.26 CPL
Fixed tracking, funnel-optimized lead generation
Key Metric
64% reduction in cost-per-conversion
From brand awareness experiment to primary growth engine — 20× budget scaling with AI-optimized performance
₹9,413 spend
Brand awareness experiment, no lead tracking
Key Metric
8 leads tracked (minimal presence)
₹1,90,000 spend
Primary growth engine with AI optimization
Key Metrics
3,306 leads at ₹57/lead
Let's talk about what a data-driven digital strategy can do for your brand. No fluff — just results.
WhatsApp Now